local and state government deficit

The government spends too much money, and with a $12 billion deficit projected for next year, there is no easy way to reduce spending. The governor has proposed many plans to reduce spending, but no one wants to cut spending from something because they feel it is important. I think that if money was spent more efficiently and some cuts were made there would not be such a large deficit. Many different programs could be reworked to aid in more than one way or provide for long term gains.
I am partially for what the governor has proposed, and cut spending across the board, but that has huge effects on everyone in every area. There should be more cut in other areas than some areas. The lottery department and the state- wide wireless network could have spending cut. It wouldn't affect as many people if those things were cut back. If money spent to balance the budget and interest was removed the state and local governments could save $20 million. Public transportation in very rural areas and country areas could be subsidized and reduced to save money. Some spending could be put in the hands of the local government to help make the most of the money, and make sure none of it gets wasted. The local government knows better on what needs the different departments have and how to give them the money they need. An example would be the funding of the transportation system. Incentive programs could also be fixed so there is a long-term gain. The municipalities aid could be cut back, but the efficiency incentive program could be strengthened. This would lead to a long term cut back on energy use and less spending on energy costs.
There are a few different ways to fix the deficit problem without affecting too many people. Many programs could help benefit more than one thing. There also needs to be a reduction of wasted money.

Sources:
http://www.budget.state.ny.us/index.html
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/New_York_state_spending.html#usgs302
http://www.openbooknewyork.com/index.htm